(Rant) Change My Mind - Onlyfans is a fraud
Naturally If the title was longer it'd be "Onlyfans is designed AGAINST the customer".
Now, im not one for simping plastic chicks for the sake of simping; for the uninitiated, here's a brief description.
Simp - Someone who does way too much for a person they like
In the case of Onlyfans and it's "Content creators", it stands to reason that these poor delusional finks are letting their wallet and cocks get the better of them, even in the wake of the Bella Thorne "Scandal".
The main issue I want to bring to light is the pure simple fact of how easy it is for these "Creators" that use OF as their basis of selling porn, and how they can twist the scheme in their favour and trick our fellow man into thinking they're a good person. I'll use examples without actually referencing because who knows, I might get copped out for slander!
"Creator A" Sets up a monthly fee of $10, along with a plethora of uploads and a description that sounds like they know what they're doing - B/G, Squirt, Anal, JOI, the whole works. The Issue? the majority of this amazing content is either locked away behind a further paywall of "Tips" or wishlist requests. Suddenly, this $10 entry fee that would normally open an entire new perspective on this instagram "model" mounts up to a questionable amount of purchases to see what happens next with the 12 inch shrek dildo. Then you are bombarded with a multitude of messages, throwing "deals" at you at discounts and bullshit mathematics that works to favour them in the end, because only they know what is being put into this "deal" of theirs and only they know their value. Maximum effort = Maximum Profit. Even their later entry discounts don't change the fact they expect you to drop $25 on a 2-3 minute vid of them taking it up the ass because they teased 3 seconds of it. it's a waste of time knowing i'll never jump on that bandwagon and having their pointless self-advertising posts get in the way of real creators that I know has content I want.
"Creator B" sets up a page at a slightly higher rate and isn't found on your usual social media circles. $15, daily/weekly content without the paywalls and locked content or wishlist, interacts with her audience, and produces some genuinely interesting and fun content that you can watch for hours on end.
Who stands to gain the most? excluding OF taking their fair share as a platform, the customer is losing out with one of these creators. Yes, i've bought into a few, and yes, most haven't paid off as well as I expected, but OF need to step up their rules and moderating to avoid pissing people off. I shouldn't have to spend $10 of my curiosity to endorse some internet whore I don't even care about with the inner linings of my wallet to show "appreciation".
What truly horrifying though? The fact that their's no refund scheme and you can't unsubscribe. You have to ride out this disingenuous torture for a month before finding a new model....just to get screwed over yet again. Google searches or certain threads come up with bare minimum on certain girls, and you can't find full content to make an informed decision before you buy into it, so it's primarily down to how well you feel about "supporting" an attention whore that gets paid for fucking herself in the ear.
"But, Curator! Noone's asking you to subscribe to them! it's your fault if you fall for it!"
Yeah, and guess who isn't gonna see the stuff i downloaded from their page before ranting my frustration ;) Even then, their not stopping their customers from providing others with negative feedback, that's on the model themselves; if they have a shitty business model, expect a shitty business image.
Downloaded? From their OF? Will you share!?
Probably not. Certain models i'll grab their content and run like the wind and sprinkle it throughout the web under different anonymous usernames to avoid getting flagged; certain models I happen to respect and appreciate, while i'll never tip them, i'll continue being a subscriber. Is that the definition of simping? probably not, because it means i get another month of seeing her flash her asshole for free!
Are their any OF models you can recommend wholeheartedly?
Absolutely! As a Disclaimer, i'm not suggesting that their content will be up your alley or anything negative, these are my personal favourites and thoroughly enjoy their content and will gladly support them with bare minimum free cash i can bother to spend.
CoyWilder
AllisonParker
Alkethedea
HannahBrooks
KittenRage
PinkyPowers
Succubusty666
MVP - Rebecca Goodwin
Ofcourse, i'm also not gonna say that you can find their content through the confines of what google may offer, you'll have to find your own way from that ;)
Now, im not one for simping plastic chicks for the sake of simping; for the uninitiated, here's a brief description.
Simp - Someone who does way too much for a person they like
In the case of Onlyfans and it's "Content creators", it stands to reason that these poor delusional finks are letting their wallet and cocks get the better of them, even in the wake of the Bella Thorne "Scandal".
The main issue I want to bring to light is the pure simple fact of how easy it is for these "Creators" that use OF as their basis of selling porn, and how they can twist the scheme in their favour and trick our fellow man into thinking they're a good person. I'll use examples without actually referencing because who knows, I might get copped out for slander!
"Creator A" Sets up a monthly fee of $10, along with a plethora of uploads and a description that sounds like they know what they're doing - B/G, Squirt, Anal, JOI, the whole works. The Issue? the majority of this amazing content is either locked away behind a further paywall of "Tips" or wishlist requests. Suddenly, this $10 entry fee that would normally open an entire new perspective on this instagram "model" mounts up to a questionable amount of purchases to see what happens next with the 12 inch shrek dildo. Then you are bombarded with a multitude of messages, throwing "deals" at you at discounts and bullshit mathematics that works to favour them in the end, because only they know what is being put into this "deal" of theirs and only they know their value. Maximum effort = Maximum Profit. Even their later entry discounts don't change the fact they expect you to drop $25 on a 2-3 minute vid of them taking it up the ass because they teased 3 seconds of it. it's a waste of time knowing i'll never jump on that bandwagon and having their pointless self-advertising posts get in the way of real creators that I know has content I want.
"Creator B" sets up a page at a slightly higher rate and isn't found on your usual social media circles. $15, daily/weekly content without the paywalls and locked content or wishlist, interacts with her audience, and produces some genuinely interesting and fun content that you can watch for hours on end.
Who stands to gain the most? excluding OF taking their fair share as a platform, the customer is losing out with one of these creators. Yes, i've bought into a few, and yes, most haven't paid off as well as I expected, but OF need to step up their rules and moderating to avoid pissing people off. I shouldn't have to spend $10 of my curiosity to endorse some internet whore I don't even care about with the inner linings of my wallet to show "appreciation".
What truly horrifying though? The fact that their's no refund scheme and you can't unsubscribe. You have to ride out this disingenuous torture for a month before finding a new model....just to get screwed over yet again. Google searches or certain threads come up with bare minimum on certain girls, and you can't find full content to make an informed decision before you buy into it, so it's primarily down to how well you feel about "supporting" an attention whore that gets paid for fucking herself in the ear.
"But, Curator! Noone's asking you to subscribe to them! it's your fault if you fall for it!"
Yeah, and guess who isn't gonna see the stuff i downloaded from their page before ranting my frustration ;) Even then, their not stopping their customers from providing others with negative feedback, that's on the model themselves; if they have a shitty business model, expect a shitty business image.
Downloaded? From their OF? Will you share!?
Probably not. Certain models i'll grab their content and run like the wind and sprinkle it throughout the web under different anonymous usernames to avoid getting flagged; certain models I happen to respect and appreciate, while i'll never tip them, i'll continue being a subscriber. Is that the definition of simping? probably not, because it means i get another month of seeing her flash her asshole for free!
Are their any OF models you can recommend wholeheartedly?
Absolutely! As a Disclaimer, i'm not suggesting that their content will be up your alley or anything negative, these are my personal favourites and thoroughly enjoy their content and will gladly support them with bare minimum free cash i can bother to spend.
CoyWilder
AllisonParker
Alkethedea
HannahBrooks
KittenRage
PinkyPowers
Succubusty666
MVP - Rebecca Goodwin
Ofcourse, i'm also not gonna say that you can find their content through the confines of what google may offer, you'll have to find your own way from that ;)
4 年 前